Pearls of Wisdom from Ridley Scott and Warren Beatty

Several mentionables in separate interviews with Director Ridley Scott and Director/Actor Warren Beatty in the December 2016 issue of Post Magazine:

Scott:  For me, if you didn’t get it in the camera, you’re going to have serious problems and issues in post. You can’t save a movie in post, no matter how many visual effects you stuff it with.

The phrase "we'll fix it in post" gets tossed around a lot, but there's just only so much that can be done on the post-production end.  Try your hardest to make things right in production.  But how does one know what's right in production?  Experience, wisdom, expertise, and clarity of what's to be accomplished — Scott discusses this later in the interview:

Scott:  If you know what you’re doing you don’t need to spend all that time... For me, speed is good. It stops you over-thinking things.

Sounds like he's done plenty of experimentation, and often he knows exactly what he wants and how to achieve it, no more no less.  Laser focused efficiency.  On the flip side, Warren Beatty mentions how unplanned spontaneity can also be beneficial:

Beatty:  A film never turns out the way you first envision it. And you hope it doesn’t, because it gets better as you go along — or it should... I had all these initial ideas in mind, but sometimes you do your best work when you don’t have anything in mind and it just happens when you’re thinking about something else.

On watching and showing their work:

Scott:  I never watch any long-form version of my films till we have it all cut and put together. So you’re a virgin and you watch it fresh.

When creating, try to experience it with a first-impression mentality so you can critique and improve it properly for your audience.  Do not let your familiarity with the material equate to clarity of the material.  Beatty talks about another aspect of immediacy:

Beatty:   I don’t like to show a film before it’s ready, because with my films, they only get ready at the last minute. To quote Cocteau, ‘A poem’s never finished, it’s just abandoned,’ and that’s how I feel. I like showing it but not to people who then have to decide what they think of it. That’s dangerous, and you only have one immediate response.

When asked his opinion on music and sound being half the movie, Beatty responds:

I wouldn’t say half. I’d say more like 95 percent. (Laughs) It’s just so important and I choose all the music myself.

Alejandro González Iñárritu on the Importance of Sound in Movies

In an interview in the January 2016 issue of Post Magazine, Director Alejandro González Iñárritu provides his thoughts on the importance of sound in movies:

I think there’s a dictatorship of the image in all films, and I really like to challenge that. For me, sound is even more important than what you see on screen, in the way that it hits you. The emotional chords are much more sensitive to sounds than images, because they’re more abstract, and like smells they can trigger a much deeper understanding of things. When you see images, they’re very concrete. When you hear them, they’re abstract in the way they trigger your own emotional baggage. So I spend a lot of time looking for just the right sounds and textures for my films...

Danny Boyle on Sound and Music for Trance

In the May 2013 issue of Post Magazine, Director Danny Boyle comments on the importance of sound and music for his latest film, Trance:


"POST:  As usual, the sound and music are also key elements in this film.

BOYLE: “They’re hugely important to me as a filmmaker. I actually believe — and we don’t realize this as an audience — that it’s at least 70 percent of a film, if not more. If you have bad sound, any movie is unwatchable, and if you turn the sound off on any film, most are also unwatchable. They just don’t work. It’s extraordinary, and sound recordists often get treated so badly on sets, even though the audio is so vital. But if you have a film with bad visual quality, you can get away with it.  In fact, your eye adapts quite quickly.  28 Days Later, for instance, was a very rough-looking film deliberately, and it didn’t faze anyone.  But there’s no way around bad sound. If you can’t hear dialogue and so on, it’s a disaster.  The opposite side is just how effective a film can become when you have really good use of sound..."